How Do You Protect Employees Away From the Company?

Many employees work alone at a customer’s site or on the road with no immediate supervision or the presence of a safety professional to check for hazards. Many employees, such as journeymen electricians and NCCCO crane operators are trained to operate with minimal supervision. Other workers may be less trained or less equipped to individually analyze their setting. Unfortunately, both types of isolated workers may violate OSHA standards, and that misconduct is more of a problem when employees are working alone.

The employer has a duty to insure their employees’ safety even where the employer has no supervision or safety professionals on site. In almost all situations, the employer cannot delegate this responsibility to others for even the most skilled workers.

So a balance must be struck.

Employers may fail to establish programs to effectively supervise these often-highly skilled employees. Or one may have a solid system in which employees confer throughout the day with supervisors, dispatchers and technicians, or the employer may have trained employees to exercise greater responsibility when working alone, but are these procedures documented?

In addition to the practical need to ensure your employees’ safety, OSHA may cite you for inadequate safety measures when remote employees are hurt. Consider how your operation would look I a “Monday morning quarterback” scenario. OSHA may envision supervision or a safety professional checking on the work or surveying the site. Such actions may not be practical for businesses such as a ready mix delivery or a skilled technician working alone on controls.

Employers must continuously remind employees to always pause, consider the site or job’s hazards, and take steps to avoid the hazards. Sure . . . that’s how we expect all employees to operate . . . but with isolated employees, you must really beat this into employees’ heads, and devise processes to remind them to take this approach. Emphasize to such workers, their unique role of having to in essence, conduct their own site safety or hazard analysis. One employer described the “TRACK” mantra their employees follow:

Stop, and

Think through the task
Recognize the hazards
Assess the Risks
Control the Hazards
Keep safety in all tasks

Under construction OSHA standards 1926.20 and 21, an employer must:

(20(b)(2)) maintain accident prevention programs providing for frequent and regular inspections of the job sites, materials, and equipment to be made by competent persons. . . .
(21(b)(2)) the employer shall instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury.

How does the employer meet its obligations when no supervisory or safety personnel accompany the workers?

Possible actions might include:

 Employers must document thorough training to equip the employees to recognize and avoid hazards.

 The employer should determine the probable range of hazards employees may encounter at various types of jobs . . . and document that it actually carried out such an analysis. Many jobs and sites are similar, and it should be possible to determine the routine hazards. Now, go a step further and consider “non-routine” hazards.

 Establish a rule, procedure or form that requires supervision to pause when assigning employees to non-routine jobs, or assigning employees to jobs with which they are less familiar. In these situations, additional training or some type of safety analysis may be necessary.

 Require employees to at least complete a very basic and short site safety analysis for those small remote jobs. Many electrical and other specialized contractors require the employee to complete a few questions on the work order paperwork requiring the employee to pause and consider hazards.

 Consider using tablets or phone apps for the hazard analysis, and as a means of tracking compliance and providing advice.

 Establish procedures for employers to call in whenever they have any questions or concerns.

 Consider whether it is feasible to spot check line crews, technicians, deliveries, or small crews. Do you do any sort of quality spot checks or inspect final work?

 Consider safety concerns unique to each site, such as lockout for electricians, skylights for those working on roofs, or overhead power lines.

 Ensure that JSA’s are thorough, accurate and consider challenges posed by customer sites.

 Ensure that employees know that you will back them if they refuse unsafe demands by customers.

 If remote employees seldom report to one of your sites where safety and other concerns can be regularly addressed, consider a regular teleconference. Many remote workers may work from home or travel from motel

About mavity2012

I am a Senior Partner operating out of the Atlanta office of Fisher & Phillips LLP, one of the Nation’s oldest and largest management employment and labor firms. My practice is national and keeps me on the road or in one of our 28 offices about 50 percent of the time. I created and co-chair the Firm's Workplace Safety and Catastrophe Management Practice Group. I have almost 29 years of experience as a labor lawyer, but rely even more heavily on the experience I gained in working in my family's various businesses, and through dealing with practical client issues. Employers tell me that they seldom meet an attorney who delivers on his promise to provide practical guidance and to be a business partner. As a result, some executives probably use different terms than “practical” to describe my fellow travelers in the profession. I don't enjoy the luxury of being impractical because I spend much of my time on shop floors and construction sites dealing with safety, union and related issues which are driven by real world processes and the need to protect and get the most out of one's most important business assets ... its employees. That's one of the reasons that I view safety compliance as a way to also manage problem employees, reduce litigation and develop the type of work environment that makes unions unnecessary. Starting out dealing with union-management challenges and a stint in the NLRB have better equipped me to see the interrelationship of legal and workplace factors. I am proud also of my experience at Fisher & Phillips, where providing “practical advice” is second only to legal excellence among the Firm’s values. Our website lists me as having provided counsel for over 225 occasions of union activity, guided unionized companies, and as having managed approximately 450 OSHA fatality cases in construction and general industry, ranging from dust explosions to building collapses, in virtually every state. I have coordinated complex inspections involving multi-employer sites, corporate-wide compliance, and issues involving criminal referral. As a full labor lawyer, I oversee audits of corporate labor, HR, and safety compliance. I have responded to virtually every type of day-to-day workplace inquiry, and have handled cases before the EEOC, OFCCP, NLRB, and numerous other state and federal agencies. At F & P, all of us seek to spot issues and then rely upon attorneys in the Firm who concentrate on those areas. No tunnel vision. I teach or speak around 50 times per year to business associations, bar and professional groups, and to individual businesses. I serve on safety committees at three states’ AGC Chapters, teach at the AGC ASMTC
This entry was posted in construction, employer policies, hazard assessment, OSHA, reducing injuries, safety programs and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s