Non Union Employers Continue to Get Busted by the NLRB for Seemingly Reasonable Policies


Thanks to my partner and friend Steve Bernstein for much of the content for this post. The bulk of the NLRB Unfair Labor Practice Charges I’m seeing against Employee Handbooks and employer rules are against non-union employers.  The Board has unreasonably expanded its concept of “concerted protected activity” to attack any policy which might be twisted and construed to discourage employees from talking about and raising issues about wages, benefits and terms and conditions of employment.  The NLRB dismisses concerns about civility in the workplace or many concerns about confidentiality.  If you have not recently carefully scrutinized your Employee Handbook and policies, I’d bet you lunch that the Board would find a number of seemingly reasonable policies to be unlawful.

The Board can order non-complying employers to take steps such as posting an employee notice describing workers’ rights, or perhaps rescinding handbook policies that run afoul of the law. Or, taking it one step further, it could force you to reinstate any employees you have discharged for violating policies it finds out of bounds.

Set forth below are just a few areas in which the agency can impact your business, along with some action items to help you steer clear of potential legal exposure:

  • Social Media Policies – The NLRB will closely scrutinize policies which broadly restrict employee rights to air public grievances concerning wages and other working conditions on Facebook, Twitter, and elsewhere (read more here).
  • Off-Duty Access Restrictions – Policies that give management the broad discretion to determine the circumstances in which employees may be disciplined for violating “no loitering” policies will likely be invalidated (read more here).
  • Class Action Waivers – Despite multiple court decisions to the contrary, the agency continues to enforce its doctrine prohibiting class action waivers contained in binding arbitration agreements, calling them an encroachment on concerted protected activity (read more here).
  • Restricting Discussion of Internal Investigations – The NLRB has issued a line of decisions invalidating policies that impose blanket restrictions on an employee’s right to discuss the status of complaints under internal investigation (read more here).
  • Solicitation and Distribution Policies – The agency is carefully scrutinizing rules that ban solicitation for “commercial purposes,” or otherwise extend beyond working areas and working time (read more here).
  • Electronic Communications – Through recent decisions such as Purple Communications, the NLRB is now invalidating policies that purport to restrict the use of electronic communications over business-owned systems during non-working time (read more here).
  • At-Will Policy Statements – Recent rulings suggest that the Board will now invalidate any at-will statements that state or imply that such status may not be modified by anyone under any circumstances (read more here).
  • Rules Requiring “Courteous” or “Respectful” Behavior – Policies broadly requiring such conduct, or prohibiting “disparaging” or other conduct that “impedes harmonious relationships,” are generally deemed unlawful (read more here).
  • Outright Bans on Workplace Photography or Recording – Through a pair of recent Board rulings, you are generally precluded from imposing outright bans on such conduct except under extremely narrow circumstances (read more here).
  • Overly Broad Restrictions on Media Disclosures – The NLRB has made clear that unless confined to situations in which the employee purports to address the media on the employer’s behalf, such restrictions are overly broad (read more here).
  • Restrictions on Public Logo Displays – Remarkably, the agency has gone so far as to suggest that you may not impose outright bans on displaying a company logo, absent compelling business reasons (read more here).
  • Overly Broad Confidentiality Rules – Policies purporting to prohibit disclosure of employee salary information or related data pertaining to wages or benefits are increasingly being struck down as overly broad (read more here).
  • Mandatory Complaint Policies – Similarly, policies compelling employees to direct their grievances through internal resolution mechanisms are also being invalidated under the concerted protected activity doctrine (read more here).

I’m surprised that many employers continue with probably unlawful policies.  While the Board has made it near impossible to enforce some rules, we’ve devised approaches to address other areas.  It just takes some thought.  So, if you have not reviewed your policies and procedures in 2016, now is the time to do so. You should scrutinize them carefully for any language that broadly restricts group discussion or action, mandates advance management approval, or otherwise broadly proscribes “unprofessional” or “inappropriate” conduct. Especially be wary of “behavior” rules that are not placed in and ties to policies such as No Harassment, No Bullying, Workplace Violence and Customer Service.

Take steps to ensure that all general restrictions are accompanied by narrower terms defining the scope of improper conduct. Avoid ambiguity in favor of specific examples where possible, and consider adding a proper disclaimer.



About mavity2012

I am a Senior Partner operating out of the Atlanta office of Fisher & Phillips LLP, one of the Nation’s oldest and largest management employment and labor firms. My practice is national and keeps me on the road or in one of our 28 offices about 50 percent of the time. I created and co-chair the Firm's Workplace Safety and Catastrophe Management Practice Group. I have almost 29 years of experience as a labor lawyer, but rely even more heavily on the experience I gained in working in my family's various businesses, and through dealing with practical client issues. Employers tell me that they seldom meet an attorney who delivers on his promise to provide practical guidance and to be a business partner. As a result, some executives probably use different terms than “practical” to describe my fellow travelers in the profession. I don't enjoy the luxury of being impractical because I spend much of my time on shop floors and construction sites dealing with safety, union and related issues which are driven by real world processes and the need to protect and get the most out of one's most important business assets ... its employees. That's one of the reasons that I view safety compliance as a way to also manage problem employees, reduce litigation and develop the type of work environment that makes unions unnecessary. Starting out dealing with union-management challenges and a stint in the NLRB have better equipped me to see the interrelationship of legal and workplace factors. I am proud also of my experience at Fisher & Phillips, where providing “practical advice” is second only to legal excellence among the Firm’s values. Our website lists me as having provided counsel for over 225 occasions of union activity, guided unionized companies, and as having managed approximately 450 OSHA fatality cases in construction and general industry, ranging from dust explosions to building collapses, in virtually every state. I have coordinated complex inspections involving multi-employer sites, corporate-wide compliance, and issues involving criminal referral. As a full labor lawyer, I oversee audits of corporate labor, HR, and safety compliance. I have responded to virtually every type of day-to-day workplace inquiry, and have handled cases before the EEOC, OFCCP, NLRB, and numerous other state and federal agencies. At F & P, all of us seek to spot issues and then rely upon attorneys in the Firm who concentrate on those areas. No tunnel vision. I teach or speak around 50 times per year to business associations, bar and professional groups, and to individual businesses. I serve on safety committees at three states’ AGC Chapters, teach at the AGC ASMTC
This entry was posted in concerted protected activity, discipline and discharge, harassment, hospitality, NLRB, social media, union organizing, unions and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s